There are a number of ways to watch a movie. Most of the time I like to sit and “absorb” the entertainment. While such an attitude towards movie-going might be our default mode, that is not the only way to watch a movie. Movies do not simply or only provide “entertainment value.” They are pieces of artwork, products of a culture. Movies embody values, ideals, philosophies, and even theological perspectives. Like every stroke from an artist's brush, every moment and visual image of a movie is “intended” or purposeful. The director chooses what to include and discards other material. There might be more than “meets the eye” in any particular film.
In addition, movies can evoke emotion, reflection, and a variety of interpretive responses from its audience. Audiences bring life-experiences and various perspectives to a movie that can be opened up and vitalized by the dramatic visualizations of a movie. Movies can stir our voices to our own deepest concerns and convictions.
In the middle of the 20th century, theologian Paul Tillich provided a framework for doing a “theology of culture.” Tillich thought that everything produced by a culture had a “religious substance.” As a result, the theologian could excavate this underlying religiousness and shed a light on it. In other words, the theologian could analyze a work of art--movie, book, play, etc--and discover a religious dimension. This religiousness could then be assessed on the basis of its adequacy for the human situation. In other words, the theologian could determine the “theological value” of the underlying religious substance of a work of art.
The movie “The Matrix” lends itself to a variety of interpretive frameworks. One can look for obvious allusions and subtle narrative similarities with the Christian faith tradition. This can be a stimulating exercise in religious trivia. But one might also consider the “deeper” theological voice of the entire movie to determine its “religious substance.” This is a theology of film, a way of considering the “theological value” of a work of art. It asks the question: “what is of ultimate concern?”
So I want to suggest that “The Matrix” tells a story that is not just a story. It is a narrative competing for our understanding. What is real? Is reality good? What is the highest good? What is wrong with humanity? What is the answer?
The Matrix just might give us some suggestions for these questions which are, in a Tillichian sense, always-already-present religious questions (present in any work of art).
So what should we look for? Reality. What is “real” in the Matrix? Why is the “real” different from the "not-real"? What is wrong with everyday human being-in-the-world? What do we need? Is this good?
Now, from the side of faith, do these suggestions from the Matrix align or detour from the trajectory of faith in the Christian tradition? Hmmm.... heavy thinking.... enjoy!
Musings
My internship with Community Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) in Lincolnshire, Illinois has come to an end. However, I will be staying on with this community of faith as the Sabbatical Minister while Kory Wilcoxson, the Senior Minister, is on Sabbatical from June 1 to September 7.
I will post my sermons, newsletter articles, as well as theological and personal reflections which may include book reviews or random thoughts. Please comment, I love conversation.
I will post my sermons, newsletter articles, as well as theological and personal reflections which may include book reviews or random thoughts. Please comment, I love conversation.
Tuesday, February 03, 2009
The Matrix of Faith
Posted by Michael Swartzentruber at 5:57 PM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I think the issue of "reality" and "truth" are significant ones brought up in "The Matrix." And what is the relationship between the two? Does something have to be true to be real? I said in a recent sermon that I know the sun is stationary, but reality tells me the sun rises and sets. So what is true in that scenario? Does reality trump truth or truth trump reality? Or, if they differ, can they co-exist? What's more real, the machines that sustain the Matrix or the Matrix itself?
ReplyDeleteThat has tremendous implications on how we read the Bible. For example, does the story of Noah's Ark have to be "real" to contain truth? And what about the resurrection: Does your belief about the reality of that event effect the truth it contributes to your faith? Heavy stuff indeed!
I would be interested to know what you mean by "reality." For instance, you said that "reality tells me," which seems to be a way of saying "I experience such and such." Is reality, for you, identical to experience?
ReplyDeleteIn the Matrix, what is (or better yet, seems to be) real for those who are "plugged in" is not the "really real." In other words, what is experienced as real for those who are plugged in is not what is actually real--it is a product of a "brain in a vat." So, one might say, following the matrix, that we need to get beneath or behind "what reality tells me" to what the "really real" is.
The Matrix points to some kind of "awakening" (here the religious and philosophical parallels/allusions are super-abundant). The set-up seems to align "truth" with the "really real" where truth means something like "what is actually the case." Morpheus offers Neo "the truth, nothing more." There seems to be a dimension of reality (better yet, the real reality) which is the source of "truth."
I think you are right to point out important parrallel structures in "reading the bible." What is "real" for us in reading the bible--the experience it yields, the historical situation which prompted the text, the material-physical document, etc?
some thinkers talk about the meaning of a text not so much in terms of the author's intentions but in terms of the 'world in front of the text.' They mean something like "the possible world we are drawn into by the text which opens us up to better living." Could the text by "true" in this way?